How will I signal my intellectual superiority on my iPad?

iPad
In E-Book Era, You Can’t Even Judge a Cover:

Such encounters are becoming increasingly difficult. With a growing number of people turning to Kindles and other electronic readers, and with the Apple iPad arriving on Saturday, it is not always possible to see what others are reading or to project your own literary tastes.
You can’t tell a book by its cover if it doesn’t have one.
“There’s something about having a beautiful book that looks intellectually weighty and yummy,” said Ms. Wiles, who recalled that when she was rereading “Anna Karenina” recently, she liked that people could see the cover on the subway. “You feel kind of proud to be reading it.” With a Kindle or Nook, she said, “people would never know.”
Among other changes heralded by the e-book era, digital editions are bumping book covers off the subway, the coffee table and the beach. That is a loss for publishers and authors, who enjoy some free advertising for their books in printed form: if you notice the jackets on the books people are reading on a plane or in the park, you might decide to check out “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” or “The Help,” too.

Also a big problem for the pompous set: how will I signal my intellectual superiority if I don’t have a library full of all the right books?

The solution will come about both technologically and socially, just like it has for music. Instead of shelves of vinyl records, or a tower of CD’s, technology has adapted to replace this form of signaling: co-workers in my office always check out what music is on a new hire’s iTunes directory; new couples scan through each other’s iPod and iTunes directories; Kindles are swapped. People broadcast their playlist via Facebook or Last.fm.

Something similar will happen when books free themselves from their physical chains. I would expect in the near future the ability of Apple iBooks to broadcast which books you have bought to the social media of your choice (with your approval). Or as a workaround, I’m sure there is a facebook application as annoying as Farmville which you can show off your literary chops to your friends.

The success of all of this signaling will be judged not on the ease of use for the user, who is broadcasting their signal, but rather the audience: the signal cannot be an indiscriminate one-to-many (like the aforementioned Farmville) or people will ignore it. The creators of this signal should look at Last.fm or Flickr for design cues. There are already many virtual bookshelves on Facebook, but the user experience (by and large) is pushing users to buy more books. A soft-sell is needed. Additionally, I might not care what friends from high school are reading, but I care deeply about one specific person’s reading habits and then care somewhat about a group of three-to-seven’s reading habits.

Sharon Zukin Sociologist, CUNY

I don’t think I agree totally with Zukin’s thesis, but this interesting summary of late-capitalist urbanism.
I especially think any discussion of gentrification which begins with what authenticity means is immediately suspect. Isn’t gentrification just a part of the ebb and flow of city life? A life which predates anyone living, so discussions of who was there first, or displacing is trite and silly.

Random iPad Thoughts

Here are some quick, half-formed thoughts about iPad which go with my last entry, iPad: Star Trek-level Shit Going On. Further posts will actually be more coherent, as I’m trying to rapidly prototype my thinking about iPad.

  1. Two disturbingly negative examples of legacy organizations struggling with how to deal with channel distribution in the iPad world:
    Turf War at the New York Times: Who Will Control the iPad?:

    On one side, a Times source explains, you have print circulation, which thinks it should control the iPad since it’s just another way to distribute the paper. They’d like to charge $20 to $30 per month for the Times‘ forthcoming iPad app, basically the product already demonstrated on stage with Steve Jobs, the source said. Why so much? Because they’re said to be afraid people will cancel the print paper if they can get the same thing on their iPad. Nevermind that iPad distribution comes with none of the paper or delivery costs associated with print, or that there’s already a free electronic edition available to subscribers who cancel.

    Will You Pay for Hulu on the iPad? It May Be Your Only Choice.

    And if Hulu decides to define the iPad as a mobile device, it would also need its content owners to grant it mobile rights, which it doesn’t actually have. Again, doable. But the broadcasters are already making money from other mobile services, like Verizon’s V Cast. So they have to tread carefully.

    What is most frustrating is that I would pay for both Hulu and The New York Times on iPad, but I fear that price expectations from legacy organizations will limit the total uptake (especially since magazines are double-downing on print). iPad versions of the NYTimes should be less than home delivery due to lower overhead (no delivery or printing cost) and Hulu should look to Netflix for their pricing model, $10 a month feels right for content I can get over-the-air for free but with the added convenience of time-shifting; additional advertising should be limited, or eliminated, for any paid subscription fee and bonuses such as full program catalogs would go a long way.
    The problem is that those in charge of both newspapers and television fundamentally don’t understand that iPad, while acting as another channel, will increase their market size and consumption habits through the form factor and ease-of-use. In the case of Hulu, the idiocy of parsing mobile versus laptop screen versus boxee-augmented television screen is breathtaking. These three object are merely different sized screens for viewing content – content that we would gladly pay through subscriptions or advertisements.

  2. Books in the Age of the iPad:

    I want to look at where printed books stand in respect to digital publishing, why we historically haven’t read long-form text on screens and how the iPad is wedging itself in the middle of everything. In doing so I think we can find the line in the sand to define when content should be printed or digitized.

    Most interesting part: content as Formless Content or Definite Content.

  3. Initial thoughts on how to design applications: Matt Gemmell on iPad Application Design. Very interesting thought on user interface changes and tactics for the iPad world.
  4. A Flickr set with all of the iPad UI Conventions shown in public advertisements and demonstrations. Zapruder-like beauty of collection.

I still believe that iPad will be a revolutionary device, especially concerning how we interact with data and place.

The Edge: With Or Without You (two versions)

First watch this short video of the making of With Or Without You, take careful note of the outro solo and Edge’s comments regarding it:

Now, watch this duet between Edge and Wyclef: