Sen. Mike Dewine (R-OH) runs doctored 9/11 photo of the Towers

This post appeared in a previous blog and is here for posterity’s sake.

Sen. Mike Dewine (R-OH) runs doctored 9/11 photo of the Towers, take a look:
20060720-dewine_ad.jpg
One problem, idiot took still a photo and photoshopped “smoke” only on the South Tower; which is impossible since the North Tower was hit (from the north) first and there was a strong wind from the west which sent the resulting smoke over the harbor and into Brooklyn (see photo). Compare, if you will, Senator DeWine’s fake photo (above, left) with an actual photo (above, right) taken from around the same area.
You make the call.
Ass.
Here’s U.S. News‘ expert explaining how diabolically wrong this image is:

“This particular image is impossible,” says W. Gene Corley, a stuctural engineer who led FEMA’s building performance study on the World Trade Center after the 9/11 attacks. Corley reviewed the ad at www.brownvotes.com for U.S. News. “The north tower was hit first [so] the south tower could not be burning without the North Tower burning.” Corley also says, “the smoke is all wrong.” The day of the attacks, the plumes of ash were drifting to the southeast. “The smoke on 9/11 was never in a halo like that,” Corley says.

Best part? AP reports the ad was created by Stevens Reed Curcio & Potholm, the same slime which brought us the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth lies ads in 2004.

Terminal 5

This post appeared in a previous blog and is here for posterity’s sake.

TWA
Recently I had the fortune to fly out of Terminal 6 at JFK on business. I had to wake up really (really) early to make the flight, but I had some time in the morning to study Eero Saarinen’s Terminal 5, and I can honestly say it is still one of the most impressive urban doors of the last 50 years (check out my photos). Terminal 5 is as grand as entering the city though Grand Central, Dulles International, or I can imagine Penn Station was. I flew through TWA in the later 1990’s, and while the finishes were slightly worn, the building was even then a delight to pass through.
While it appears that I’m late to the party on looking over what JetBlue and Gensler are doing to Terminal 5, let’s take a look anyway.
TWA
Built for the now-defunct TransWorld Airlines (TWA), Terminal 5 has been empty since 2001, only opening to the public for a short-lived art exhibition which was cut short by the graffiti and destruction of hipsters at the opening party; thus ruining it for everyone, punks.
The fate of Terminal 5 hung in the balance for what seemed like an eternity, while future tenant JetBlue (an excellent airline, by the way) worked with the local historical agencies, the Port Authority and their architect to design their way out of a bag and history. The architects are Gensler and Associates (project website) and David Rockwell, working on the exterior and interior respectively. Construction began in 2004 (here’s the news release from Gensler and from the Port Authority) and as of a few days ago, it appeared that around 50% of the structural steel has been erected for the new terminal.
Luckily, JetBlue has decided to retain Saarinen’s main terminal while building a new 26-gate, 635,000 sf terminal situated between the tarmac and the historical Terminal 5. Please see the following aerials, the first is what was existing showing the original Terminal 5 and original Flight Wing Tube #1, and the newer Flight Wing Tube #2 by Roche & Dinkeloo to handle 747 airplanes.
Existing Terminal 5
The next aerial is what was demolished for the new terminal:
Terminal 5 Demo
Finally, this last aerial is a Gensler rendering overlaid onto a google maps aerial:
Gensler's plan for Terminal 5
Now, onto the new terminal renderings, again by Gensler:
rendering
rendering
rendering
TWA - What's Old?
It is very admirable that JetBlue is retaining the historically protected terminal. However, the two terminals will be bisected by what appears to be a very wide (at least 4 lanes) car drive, thus turning the historic terminal into an island among blacktop. What actual program will inhabit the historical building is apparently up in the air – which is a shame since the lack of purpose will invariably place Terminal 5 at the whims of change. I only hope that, if one wishes, upon arrival or departure fliers can embark or disembark through the historical hall.
Now would be a good time to discuss how uninspiring the new terminal is, judging by all the renderings.
While David Rockwell’s interior renderings are quite evocative I still can’t shake the feeling of being in a mall. Please see below, from David Rockwell:
20060714-rockwell01.jpg
20060714-rockwell02.jpg
Obviously competing with a masterpiece such as Terminal 5 is a fool’s errand, but Gensler’s solution is all function, and no spirit. It is one matter to design and execute a nice background building, it is another matter entirely to let scope and budget take over. To be fair, I’m still reserving passing total judgement on the new terminal until it is completes. But it is safe to say that the monumental (but not in scale) airline passenger terminal is still dead.
See all of my Terminal 5 photos and stay tuned, I have more to say about this (soon).

How to Steal a Bike in NYC

This post appeared in a previous blog and is here for posterity’s sake.


Using an angle grinder was my favorite method.

Greenpoint Terminal Warehouse Fire

This post appeared in a previous blog and is here for posterity’s sake.

Fire @ the WarehouseFire @ the Warehouse, originally uploaded by plemeljr
One of my favorite buildings in Greenpoint, the Greenpoint Terminal Warehouse is on fire. I was able to get right down to Oak and West Streets and the air was noticibly hot. There wasn’t much for the firefighters to do: the building was unstable and when I was there a large portion of the exterior masonry walls fell:
Fire @ the WarehouseFire @ the Warehouse, originally uploaded by plemeljr
It is a shame that these building had to go like this; there was talk by the uniforms about a “developer fire,” but right now this is just speculation.
Here are some photos
Holy crap! It went to a Seven alarms fire – I thought it stopped at 5!
Well, look at this, look who is a partial owner of the site:

Going south from Greenpoint Avenue, a 14-acre parcel is rumored to be slated for development by developer Joshua Gutman, who owns several buildings in Dumbo, and who declined to comment for this article.
Immediately south of Gutman’s parcel is land owned by B & H Photo, Vance said, and a few smaller lots where various owners have no plans that have been made public.

Joshua Gutman is the notorious developer who owned 223 Water Street which suspiciously caught on fire two years ago (pdf). Two fires in two years? This guy can’t be that lucky, can he?
Update @ 13:12
Holy crap – the fire is up to 9 alarm fire! If a 5 alarm = 200+ men, then there are upwards of 300+ men figting what the fire department says, “is the largest fire in New York City in 10 years, not counting the World Trade Center disaster.”
From Flickr Thread:

Also called Mary Habstritt of the Society for Industrial Archaeology. She explained that these mills were built to burn slowly, to give workers time to escape and fire crews time to arrive. Fire was an ever-present hazard in mills full (in this case) of thousands of bales of jute and hemp. It looks like this fire had some “help” getting going. Although these are an old, abandonned buildings, they still should’ve burned slowly.
Mary said she’s seen a lot of fire in historic buildings that being renovated. The “help” that gets these fires started sometimes comes from construction crews doing demolition. Sparks from their tools can ignite something very small, which then grows into a bigger fire after workers leave for the day. There were crews at the AMC doing clean-up work (removing windows, etc).
She also quoted a fire dept contact who told her that 20 years ago crews taking down the piers that used to be on the Hudson got paid a premium if sites were fire-damaged. As a result there were many, many fires set by crews in order to collect the premium.
Anyway, it’s much too early to know what started this fire. It’s just heart-breaking for me to see it go. Apparently these buildings are held up by their wooden internal structure. Once the roof trusses burn, the walls will cave in. Certainly looks like that’s what’s going to happen next….

Check out the Perkins Eastman designs for the renovation. Looks like they have a tabla rasa now.
Update @14:55
If you wondered how much equipment does into a 9 alarm fire, then FDNY Dispatch Policy is for you:

Fifth alarm (signal 5-5)
  • 20 engines
  • 11 ladders
  • 5 battalion chiefs
  • 1 rescue
  • 1 squad
  • 1 deputy chief
  • 1 RAC unit
  • 1 satellite
  • safety battalion
  • SOC battalion
  • 1 tactical support unit
  • field comm
All subsequent alarms, add:
  • 4 engines
  • 2 ladders

So that would be the following minimum equipment on site:

  • 36 engines
  • 17 ladders
  • 5 battalion chiefs
  • 1 rescue
  • 1 squad
  • 1 deputy chief
  • 1 RAC unit
  • 1 satellite
  • safety battalion
  • SOC battalion
  • 1 tactical support unit
  • field comm

With 6 men per apparatus that works out to around 370 men on site. That’s pretty insane.
More to follow…