archigram, originally uploaded by lists&diagrams
See more Archigram photos and study the Archigram past.
archigram, originally uploaded by lists&diagrams
See more Archigram photos and study the Archigram past.
A new island: Hadid unveils radical plan for Bilbao:
The British-Iraqi architect Zaha Hadid has presented radical plans for the city’s neglected Zorrozaurre peninsula, part of a redevelopment that would see it converted into an island.
Once a crucial part of the port, the peninsula, in the estuary of the river Nervión, had been left to decay. With only around 450 people living there and a few small industries left, it seemed to have no part of Bilbao’s glowing future.
While urban renewal and reuse is certainly admirable, a quick google search shows that not all who live on the Zorrozaurre peninsula share Hadid’s vision. See Proyecto Zorrozaurre, Zaha Hadid. Bilbao for a exhaustive series of images of Hadid’s plan and Zorrozaurre Master Plan @ The Pritzker pdf. The Forum for a Sustainable Zorrozaurre is highly critical of the proposed plan (see Creating an Eco-Community In A Post-Industrial Wastelandfish pdf).
Below is a map of the Zorrozaurre peninsula:
St Pancras, originally uploaded by gregnugent
Speaking of St Pancras, see other St Pancras Station construction photos by the same photographer.
The miracle of St Pancras and slideshow:
St Pancras was destined to be connected to the continent ever since the day in 1877 when Sir George Gilbert Scott’s magnificent station and hotel were finally declared complete. And next month that destiny will finally be realised, when the Queen launches the terminus into the world of 21st-century high-speed European rail travel. From November 14, Eurostar trains will writhe out from under the station’s unforgettable train shed roof through new tunnels and £5.8bn-worth of newly forged engineering works to reach Paris Gare du Nord in just two-and-a-quarter hours.
Smogr’s previous St Pancras coverage.
Check out this, old by internet time, map featuring only the names of the street: London’s Kerning.
Suburban Sprawl, originally uploaded by Joe_13
In The Atlantic Monthly Virginia Postrel has an article, A Tale of Two Town Houses, about two distinct models for successful American cities, which both reflect and reinforce different cultural and political attitudes.
Furthermore,
The Dallas model, prominent in the South and Southwest, sees a growing population as a sign of urban health. Cities liberally permit housing construction to accommodate new residents. The Los Angeles model, common on the West Coast and in the Northeast Corridor, discourages growth by limiting new housing. Instead of inviting newcomers, this approach rewards longtime residents with big capital gains and the political clout to block projects they don’t like.
…
The unintended consequence of these land-use policies is that Americans are sorting themselves geographically by income and lifestyle—not across neighborhoods, as they used to, but across regions. People are more likely to live surrounded by others like themselves, creating a more-polarized cultural map. In the superstar cities, where opinion leaders congregate, the perception is growing that the country no longer has a place for middle-class life. Yet the same urban sophisticates who fret that you can’t live decently on less than $100,000 a year often argue vociferously that increasing density will degrade their quality of life. They may be right—but, like any other luxury good, that quality commands a high price.
It is a very interesting article, but Postrel is completely wrong concerning constricting housing market in the Northeast, especially New York City. Granted, New York City is an edge case, but I can’t throw a rock without hitting a residential development in NYC. All up and down the Northeast Corridor urban cores are repopulating and density is growing. In the last six years, the Boston-NYC-Washington Corridor added over 1.59 million residents.
Postrel’s point about the difficulty of building new housing in the Northeast Corridor has merit. Yet, both Los Angeles proper and NYC the limiting factor is geography: Manhattan is an island and LA is a series of valleys. NYC is rapidly populating parts of Brooklyn and Staten Island creating dense pockets of high rise buildings next to tenements. While Los Angeles is a product of its history and zoning, a series of monochromatic suburbs, I was just in Dallas, and there was little measurable difference between the suburban wasteland of the LA Valley and DFW. Postrel’s comparing Dallas/Ft. Worth to Los Angeles noting that DFW was a place where things got done and cheaply are interesting, as if housing prices aren’t intrinsically bound to irrational concepts of “livability.”
See also Big-Media-Matt’s take on Zoning Ourselves to Death.
matchbox5.jpg, originally uploaded by COOP666
That’s right, Matchbox Collector’s Catalog, 1969. (Via Draplin via Coudal, via Coop)
Design can be fun, too.