The new corporate logo: Dynamic and changeable are all the rage. Identities such as Pentagram’s new Saks identity and Google are explored, but the best (so far) is the The Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics which has a logo that changes every time it is used, see also pdf on the design (via)
Cingular Jack, We Hardly Knew Ye
Transit Gratis
Transit Gratis: Should transit be treated as a inaliable social right, or a material system? See also Comparative Analysis of Transit Bandwidth and my riff on Adam’s ideas, Transit Policy: Whole Cost of Transit
On Walled Gardens in the social software age
New York Congressman Anthony Weiner Rips the “Republic Party”
Super Mario Brothers Beatboxing Flute
More Super Mario Brothers Music: Super Mario Brothers Beatboxing Flute
Super Mario Brothers on guitar
Thierry Gomez plays Super Mario Brothers on guitar
Bitches Ain’t Shit – A Capella
DeCadence (an A Cappella group at UC Berkeley) sings Bitches Ain’t Shit – A Capella in the manner of Ben Folds
Landmarks Districts as Gated Communities
This post appeared in a previous blog and is here for posterity’s sake.
The blue tower, originally uploaded by Goggla
John Lumea has makes a pretty good case about NIMBYopolis, or, Height Restrictions in the LES are Bunk, how the coming “contextual” rezoning of the Lower East Side is a very bad thing.
I don’t have the energy to respond to his main thesis, but one of his side points was this:
The fact is, New York’s preservation culture has become a luxury the City can no longer afford. The example of the Upper East Side Historic District points to a set of questions that should — sooner rather than later — prompt a wholesale reassessment of the City’s preservation / downzoning agenda:
- Why should City Planning and Landmarks Preservation continue to protect select neighborhoods from development and increase protections for others, when these neighborhoods can accommodate additional growth and while surrounding areas get buried in a thicket of oversized buildings?
- Why shouldn’t every neighborhood have to participate in sustainability?
- Why wouldn’t they want to?
Which struck me as an insight John should elaborate on; if by 2030 over 9.1 million (900,000 more) will live in New York City, this will create an enormous pressure on the city to find houses for the additional residents. This is, in fact John’s thesis that continual logistical and commercial pressure will mean larger buildings everywhere.
Except, of course, landmark districts.
Who live in landmark districts? Well, in Manhattan many landmark districts – TriBeCa, the West Village, Chelsea, the Upper East Side – are playground of the rich. In 2005 Forbes listed 10013 the 13th most expensive Zip Code – this is TriBeCa, and 10013 is mostly the historic district. This makes TriBeCa the most expensive place in NYC – no small matter.
The dynamic the city is setting up is clear: rich people located in “desirable” (which landmarks districts are – I live in one by sheer luck) areas which will never, ever, change. Surrounding these low-rise enclaves will be high-rise housing which will be necessary due to the increased economic pressure.
Much like Gramercy Park these landmark districts will become gated communities – de facto or not.
As for a solution, I don’t have one at the moment, but it is forthcoming.
Frequency of use typeface
Creating type based on letter usage: Frequency of use typeface