Friday Links, just wanna have fun

Work Architecture - Urban Farm

Iconeye Manifestos

Via Ben H comes a series of 50 Icon Eye’s Manifestos, which are all interesting to read; especially check out Rem Koolhaas’ manifesto, Europe is doing almost ridiculously well:

We fly for next to nothing, we have the highest quality prisons, Europe gave us millions of new friends, Frisian Lakes are maintained in order, sewers that ruined the most beautiful beaches are gone, the Spanish countryside is now a polished backdrop for whizzing high-speed trains.War criminals are put on trial. Ireland is rich. The Turkish think about who they want to become.

400 million of us dictate the taste of six billion people. We decide what is beautiful and what is good behaviour. (sic) Our rules are contagious and are voluntarily complied with by all others. No one is afraid of us, yet we are immensely popular.

While Rem’s cheerleading of all thinks European, along with their forthcoming commercial and capitalistic hegemony is great and all, other so-called manifestos are more instructive on where we are going from here. Specifically:

I know the idea of gathering 50 manifestos from different designers and architects was to comparatively illustrate the differences, but in the three above ideas you have three completely different world views, all relating to ornament and form.
I can’t shake the idea that we haven’t completely closed the arguments of the late 1990’s; perhaps the decade’s long aberration of riches will settle down and we will all have so much more time to read and argue about Post Colonial Theory and decide once and for all the manner of form, how/why form is derived and whether or not linguistic theory is applicable to design. Or have these issues already been resolved, and I was too busy working with developers?

SHoP’s Distributed Airport Terminals

Speaking of transportation paradigms, I remember New York Magazine’s featuring a rethinking of airport travel from SHoP architects:

It’s a high-speed-rail loop, in which trains would serve both as a means of conveyance to the airport and, in effect, as the airport. In a bold new check-in paradigm, passengers would get their boarding passes and go through security at special stations in Union Square and Red Hook (and Astoria and Grand Central and …), then hop on trains that would let them out directly at their plane. Such an approach would have the added benefit of reducing the airport space devoted to terminals, making room for more runways.

While onboard the shuttle trains, passengers could check in luggage, shop duty-free online, and have a drink or two before disembarking at the gate.
Photo-illustration by SHoP Architects

While their proposal to double the amount of runways at JFK is nigh impossible due to the limitations of airspace and safe airplane taxi regulations, this proposal is certainly interesting. A precedent (on a smaller scale) is undoubtedly Eero Saarinen’s Mobile Lounges featured at Dulles International Airport, but on a grand scale. This is a grand gesture in the manner of Daniel Burnham, and because of that, it has zero chance of happening in New York City. However, this plan could be executed quite nicely at a tabla rasa, such as all of those cities China is building.

mobile-lounge