Ebenezer Howard Garden Cities of To-Morrow

A foundational work in urban theory is Ebenezer Howard’s Garden Cities of To-Morrow (final version published in 1902), which for the first time outlined the separation of urban uses – residential, commercial and industrial – and strove to bring the unruly city into perfect Victorian order. Also note that instead of the antiquated streets London so famously developed over hundreds of years, the Garden City’s road network would be supreme; transportation, circulation and movement were the overriding parti governing the logic of the Garden City.
Excerpts from Ebenezer Howard’s seminal work can be found at Garden Cities of To-Morrow which also contains additional commentary:

The two chapters of his book reprinted below are those describing his vision of Garden City’s physical characteristics and how a cluster of them might be created as population increased. Howard was no designer, and he stated that the plan for a town on an actual site would doubtless depart from the one he described. He also labeled each of his drawings “Diagram only. Plan cannot be drawn until site selected.” Nevertheless, his verbal pictures and accompanying diagrams reflect his own beliefs about how a model garden city should be laid out. The ring and radial pattern of his imaginary Garden City was a plan that many other writers of the time also favored, because of its perceived superiority from both engineering and architectural viewpoints.

Howard’s emphasis on the importance of a permanent girdle of open and agricultural land around the town soon became part of British planning doctrine that eventually developed almost into dogma. Its most impressive application was the plan for Greater London (ed note – see London Plan) in 1944 and–following passage of the New Towns Act of 1946 (ed note – see New Towns Act 1946) – the creation of a ring of new towns beyond the London Greenbelt.

Ebenezer Howard Garden Cities of To-Morrow - OverviewEbenezer Howard Garden Cities of To-Morrow (sic) Plan Overview
Ebenezer Howard Garden Cities of To-Morrow - DetailEbenezer Howard Garden Cities of To-Morrow (sic) Plan Detail
See also:

Home Owners’ Loan Corporation Redlining of Philadelphia

Home Owners' Loan Corporation Redlining of Philadelphia
Home Owners’ Loan Corporation Redlining of Philadelphia

WikiPedia on Redlining:

Redlining is the practice of denying or increasing the cost of services, such as banking, insurance, access to jobs, access to health care, or even supermarkets to residents in certain, often racially determined, areas. The most devastating form of redlining, and the most common use of the term, refers to mortgage discrimination.

Read also the RACIAL REDLINING: A Study of Racial Discrimination by Banks and Mortgage Companies in the United States:

This study examines the issue of racial redlining by major mortgage lenders in the nation’s larger metro areas. Racial redlining is the practice whereby mortgage lenders figuratively draw a red line around minority neighborhoods and refuse to make mortgage loans available inside the red lined area. Broadly defined, racial redlining encompasses not only the direct refusal to lend in minority neighborhoods, but also procedures that discourage the submission of mortgage loan applications from minority areas, and marketing policies that exclude such areas.
In direct economic terms, racial redlining reduces housing finance options for borrowers in minority neighborhoods and weakens competition in the mortgage market. This often results in higher mortgage costs and less favorable mortgage loan terms. More subtly, racial redlining discourages minorities from pursuing home ownership opportunities and in the broadest sense further entrenches the debilitating sociological effects of racial discrimination.

Especially read the section, Worst case lending patterns to see what unregulated redlining produces.

Weekend Links

Le Corbusier and La Ville Radieuse

La Ville radieuse

During our Jane Jacobs – The Death and Life of Great American Cities book club many ideas and movements will be discussed, ideas which are not particularly en vogue at the moment.

Le Corbusier, Swiss-born French architect of considerable fame is never out of vogue, but some of his more radical ideas have fallen considerably out of favor with the intelligentsia. La Ville radieuse, his 1935 opus on urban thought is one of those items. Envisioned as an antidote to the filth of the (mostly European) cities which were just beginning to be rebuilt from the horrors of the World War; the logical planning of this machine city was conceived as a centrally-planned community of the now-famous towers in parks.

LeCorbusier and the Radiant City Contra True Urbanity and the Earth:

The Radiant City grew out of this new conception of capitalist authority and a pseudo-appreciation for workers’ individual freedoms. The plan had much in common with the Contemporary City – clearance of the historic cityscape and rebuilding utilizing modern methods of production. In the Radiant City, however, the pre-fabricated apartment houses, les unites, were at the center of “urban” life. Les unites were available to everyone (not just the elite) based upon the size and needs of each particular family. Sunlight and recirculating air were provided as part of the design. The scale of the apartment houses was fifty meters high, which would accommodate, according to Corbusier, 2,700 inhabitants with fourteen square meters of space per person. The building would be placed upon pilotus, five meters off the ground, so that more land could be given over to nature. Setback from other unites would be achieved by les redents, patterns that Corbusier created to lessen the effect of uniformity.

Corbusier spends a great deal of the Radiant City manifesto elaborating on services available to the residents. Each apartment block was equipped with a catering section in the basement, which would prepare daily meals (if wanted) for every family and would complete each families’ laundry chores. The time saved would enable the individual to think, write, or utilize the play and sports grounds which covered much of the city’s land. Directly on top of the apartment houses were the roof top gardens and beaches, where residents sun themselves in Anatural” surroundings – fifty meters in the air. Children were to be dropped off at les unites’ day care center and raised by scientifically trained professionals. The workday, so as to avoid the crisis of overproduction, was lowered to five hours a day. Women were enjoined to stay at home and perform household chores, if necessary, for five hours daily. Transportation systems were also formulated to save the individual time. Corbusier bitterly reproaches advocates of the horizontal garden city (suburbs) for the time wasted commuting to the city. Because of its compact and separated nature, transportation in the Radiant City was to move quickly and efficiently. Corbusier called it the vertical garden city.

More on this later.

Marina City Condo Association Claims Copyright on Photos taken of Building

cob citycob city, originally uploaded by twoeightnine

Marina Towers Condo Association is claiming copyright on the building image and name:

“Because of the architectural significance of our building, the Condominium Association holds a common law copyright on the use of the Association name and building image. This means that under Federal and Illinois law, advertisers, movie makers and others cannot use the Association name or image without first obtaining express written permission from the Association . .”

Read more: Stop Taking Pictures of Marina City and The bigger picture: Can the association control how images of Marina City are used?